Guns
The NRA says that the best defense
against gunmen in school is armed guards at schools. In our circles and in the establishment press
the NRA is pilloried, derided and treated as idiotic. The political posturing has been fine
theatre. Candy Crowley on CNN asked the
NRA spokesperson what kind of country we would be if we did that?
Contraria started this series by
saying, “when everyone knows something to be true it is probably false”.
Well, the kind of country we would
be with armed guards at the schools would be…Israel.
Arabs entered the Netiv Meir
elementary school in Ma’alot Israel on May 15, 1974 taking 115 hostages. When the Israelis stormed the building the
Arabs sprayed the children with machine gun fire, killing 22 and wounding
68. A good day for the Religion of
Peace.
Arabs prefer to attack “soft”
targets in Israel
such as buses, schools, pizza parlors or discotheques, where the most children
can be killed. The Israeli response has
generally been to provide guards.
Shopping mall entrances are guarded and bags examined. Streets are patrolled and schools are
provided security. Most Israeli streets
are safer than most Chicago
streets.
Crowley has asked the wrong question. It is not relevant what kind of country we
would be if we protected the children – it is relevant to ask what kind of
country we already are where evil or crazy people kill children, and we leave
soft targets exposed to the killers. In
the past months we have seen mass murders at movies, malls and schools. What kind of country are we that won’t take
the steps shown to be effective to stop mass murderers from killing children?
I have no tolerance for the NRA. The Second Amendment does not sanction private
armies, and no individual should own an Abrams tank, an F-18 or a high capacity
assault rifle. However, I do know that
Columbine happened while the assault gun ban was in effect, and we do not have
any alternative history as to what would have happened if the Newtown killer had different weapons.
We have become accustomed to the
necessity of taking off our shoes and being scanned at the airport. We wish it weren’t so, but we do what we need
to do. I agree with President Obama that we don’t know that tighter gun laws
would prevent the next attack, but we need to do what we can to lessen the
likelihood or to limit the tools available to the killers. How many more dead
before we introduce security at the soft targets?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home